<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going 64-Bit, Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=going-64-bit-revisited</link>
	<description>Tech Support, Networking, and Programming Services in Mifflinburg, PA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Reich</title>
		<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reich-consulting.net/?p=174#comment-217</guid>
		<description>@bigjust:

I&#039;ve got to say I&#039;m a little bit humbled. I do appreciate any relevant criticism, even when it does knock me down a few pegs. I thought I gave credit where credit was due in this post.  However  my response to you was over the top and for what it&#039;s worth, I apologize.

To explain myself a bit, my blog is almost elusively about Windows support issues (and very obvious about it) yet just about every post someone manages to find their way here and give me the &quot;well Linux doesn&#039;t have that problem&quot; half-truths, and it doesn&#039;t help anyone.  So why bother?

I&#039;ve never gone to the Ubuntu forums to brag that my off-the-shelf Linksys adapter worked on XP without the need to edit config files (just an example, this might be fixed) because I&#039;d be a) flame-baiting, and b) wasting people&#039;s time.  Why should I put up with the same pointless showboating on my own blog?

I do think that feelings of annoyance at this sort of behavior are relevant but it wasn&#039;t appropriate for me to direct it all at you.  So once again, sorry for going overboard.

Regarding what you said about my post, at least we agree on something! I had to call Best Buy on my customer&#039;s behalf and play the &quot;we spend a crap-ton of money at your establishment&quot; card, and then they allowed us to do an exchange.

Thanks for stopping by.

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bigjust:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to say I&#8217;m a little bit humbled. I do appreciate any relevant criticism, even when it does knock me down a few pegs. I thought I gave credit where credit was due in this post.  However  my response to you was over the top and for what it&#8217;s worth, I apologize.</p>
<p>To explain myself a bit, my blog is almost elusively about Windows support issues (and very obvious about it) yet just about every post someone manages to find their way here and give me the &#8220;well Linux doesn&#8217;t have that problem&#8221; half-truths, and it doesn&#8217;t help anyone.  So why bother?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never gone to the Ubuntu forums to brag that my off-the-shelf Linksys adapter worked on XP without the need to edit config files (just an example, this might be fixed) because I&#8217;d be a) flame-baiting, and b) wasting people&#8217;s time.  Why should I put up with the same pointless showboating on my own blog?</p>
<p>I do think that feelings of annoyance at this sort of behavior are relevant but it wasn&#8217;t appropriate for me to direct it all at you.  So once again, sorry for going overboard.</p>
<p>Regarding what you said about my post, at least we agree on something! I had to call Best Buy on my customer&#8217;s behalf and play the &#8220;we spend a crap-ton of money at your establishment&#8221; card, and then they allowed us to do an exchange.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjust</title>
		<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reich-consulting.net/?p=174#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Trust me, the number of negative responses from readers, the lack of clarity from the post, and general attitude taken towards critism (undeserved or otherwise), you shouldn&#039;t encounter this problem again.

Past this, I agree its wrong for the manufacturer to force the 64-bitiness of an OS on you (or your client).  To me the only viable solution is return and purchase a new, compatible laptop.  Has the laptop been owned so long that the best that could be done is an exchange?  If they give you that &quot;already opened, can&#039;t return&quot; nonsense, get a manager, and be prepared to pay a little more for a different, just as powerful model with your desired OS.

And to be honest, I get no gratification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me, the number of negative responses from readers, the lack of clarity from the post, and general attitude taken towards critism (undeserved or otherwise), you shouldn&#8217;t encounter this problem again.</p>
<p>Past this, I agree its wrong for the manufacturer to force the 64-bitiness of an OS on you (or your client).  To me the only viable solution is return and purchase a new, compatible laptop.  Has the laptop been owned so long that the best that could be done is an exchange?  If they give you that &#8220;already opened, can&#8217;t return&#8221; nonsense, get a manager, and be prepared to pay a little more for a different, just as powerful model with your desired OS.</p>
<p>And to be honest, I get no gratification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Reich</title>
		<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reich-consulting.net/?p=174#comment-213</guid>
		<description>@bigjust: Awesome! Now if you could only find a solution to keeping Linux trolls off my blog we&#039;d be in business!

Seriously, what gratification do you people get by forcing your superiority complex on everyone?

Besides my issue was one of drivers, and Linux doesn&#039;t have drivers (32-bit or 64-bit) for the crazy hardware that I&#039;m dealing with.

Thanks for nothing,

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bigjust: Awesome! Now if you could only find a solution to keeping Linux trolls off my blog we&#8217;d be in business!</p>
<p>Seriously, what gratification do you people get by forcing your superiority complex on everyone?</p>
<p>Besides my issue was one of drivers, and Linux doesn&#8217;t have drivers (32-bit or 64-bit) for the crazy hardware that I&#8217;m dealing with.</p>
<p>Thanks for nothing,</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjust</title>
		<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reich-consulting.net/?p=174#comment-212</guid>
		<description>You know, to get around this issue, I simply chroot into my 32 bit environment and run my 32-bit only apps from there.....Oh Windows, nevermind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, to get around this issue, I simply chroot into my 32 bit environment and run my 32-bit only apps from there&#8230;..Oh Windows, nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Going 64-Bit: A Cautionary Tale &#124; Reich Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.reich-consulting.net/2009/06/19/going-64-bit-revisited/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Going 64-Bit: A Cautionary Tale &#124; Reich Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reich-consulting.net/?p=174#comment-210</guid>
		<description>[...] over on DZone. In an effort to keep the discussion going, I replied to some reader comments in a separate entry, called Going 64-Bit, Revisited.  Discussion   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over on DZone. In an effort to keep the discussion going, I replied to some reader comments in a separate entry, called Going 64-Bit, Revisited.  Discussion   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 342/346 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.reich-consulting.net @ 2012-02-12 10:45:28 -->
